Jurisdiction
GlobalPayment-message transparency requirements for originator and beneficiary information across cross-border payment chains.
At a glance
Authority, jurisdiction, legal layer, lifecycle and applicability in a comparable obligation profile.
Lifecycle
Revised / implementation transitionAuthority
Financial Action Task ForceAccess
Public official sourcePublisher & obligations
Authorities, markets, payment activities and related obligations connected through sourced relationships.
RecordTypeRelationshipScope
FATF 40FATF 40 RecommendationsAML & MonitoringgovernsGlobalFrench Southern TerritoriesFrench Southern TerritoriesMarketjurisdictional scope supported by the official instrumentEMEAArmeniaArmeniaMarketjurisdictional scope supported by the official instrumentEMEABonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaMarketjurisdictional scope supported by the official instrumentLatAmChinaChinaMarketjurisdictional scope supported by the official instrumentAPACWho and what is in scope
Payment service providers and financial institutions
What implementation teams must operationalise
Carry accurate party information, enable payment-chain transparency and apply risk-based controls to missing data.
Published facts
Official-source facts with publication, effective and review dates kept separate.
Authority / publisher
Financial Action Task Forcehigh1 source
Jurisdiction
Globalhigh1 source
Legal citation
FATF Recommendation 16high1 source
Applies to
Payment service providers and financial institutionshigh1 source
Core obligations
Carry accurate party information, enable payment-chain transparency and apply risk-based controls to missing data.high1 source



