Covers Persons and entities designated under Australian autonomous and UN sanctions regimes.

The main requirements are to screen customers and transactions; freeze or prevent dealings where required; avoid making assets available; obtain permits before authorised activity.

Sanctions screening connects the identity of customers and counterparties to restrictions imposed by the relevant legal authority. Resolving a potential name match requires identifiers and context; a similar name alone does not establish that the person is designated. Ownership and control can also matter where the governing regime extends restrictions to entities beyond those expressly listed.

The applicable measure determines the response. Freezing assets, refusing a prohibited service, obtaining a licence and reporting to an authority are different actions with different legal conditions. A consolidated list is an operational aid, while the underlying legal instruments establish the prohibitions, exceptions and jurisdictional reach. The absence of a name from one list does not settle every sanctions question.

For payments, the relevant parties can include the sender, beneficiary, intermediary institutions and other persons with an interest in the transaction. Effective controls preserve the list attribution, match evidence and decision rationale, and respond to changes in designations or ownership. AML suspicion reporting remains a separate process even where the same transaction raises both concerns.

The instrument also addresses reporting and evidence: report suspected matches, frozen assets and relevant dealings to competent authorities as required.